检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭瑞雁[1] Guo Ruiyan
机构地区:[1]山西农业大学公共管理学院
出 处:《政治思想史》2023年第3期148-165,200,共19页Journal of the History of Political Thought
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“美式民主的理论悖论与实践困境研究”(21&ZD60)的阶段成果。
摘 要:多元文化共存是西方多数国家的现状,如何应对差异性文化也是西方多数国家普遍面临的难题。多元文化主义兴起于20世纪70年代,其宗旨在于承认少数群体的存在及价值,并提倡通过特殊赋权对少数群体权益进行保护。在种族议题上,多元文化主义到底发挥的是引发种族冲突还是促进种族融合的作用,学术界的评价大相径庭。对多元文化主义的不同界定是影响评价的重要因素,同时,各国国情及多元文化政策具体执行策略也是影响评价的客观因素。无论如何,结合各自国情鉴别并选择恰当的多元文化主义为指引才是较为科学的做法。Multicultural coexistence is the status quo of most western countries,and how to deal with different cultures is also a common problem faced by most western countries.Multiculturalism rose in the 1970s,with the aim of recognizing the existence and value of minority groups and advocating the protection of minority rights and interests through special empowerment.On the issue of race,whether multiculturalism plays a role of triggering racial conflicts or promoting racial integration is quite controversial in academic circles.The different definitions of multiculturalism are important factors that affect the evaluation.At the same time,the national conditions of each country and the specific implementation strategy of multicultural policies are also objective factors that affect the evaluation.In any case,it is more scientific to identify and choose appropriate multiculturalism as the guide in combination with respective national conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15