当代西方左翼政治哲学能忠于自我所有权吗?——以柯亨与左翼自由至上主义学派的分歧为例  

Can Contemporary Western Left-Wing Political Philosophy Commit to Self-Ownership?-The Case of the Differences Between Cohen and the School of Left-Libertarianism

作　　者：王增收 Wang Zengshou

机构地区：[1]南通大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《政治思想史》2023年第3期166-181,200,共17页Journal of the History of Political Thought

摘　　要：左翼政治哲学能忠于自我所有权吗?作为当代西方左翼政治哲学前辈的柯亨,认为要打败自由至上主义必须先驳倒其自我所有观。基于自我所有权本质上具有产生不平等的趋势这一基本判断,柯亨提出了必须限制自我所有权的忠告;而同属左翼阵营的左翼自由至上主义学派却主张通过原初外部资源的平等主义分配来接纳自我所有权。分析二者产生分歧的原因,可以得出的结论是,左翼政治哲学必须承认自我所有权在防范侵犯上具有不可替代的作用,即使为了自主去限制它也是缺乏说服力的。Can left-wing political philosophy commit to self-ownership?As a forerunner of contemporary western left-wing political philosophy,G.A.Cohen believes that in order to defeat libertarianism,left-wing political philosophy must refute its viewpoint on self-ownership.Based on the basic judgment that self-ownership inherently tends to generate inequality,Cohen proposes the advice that self-ownership must be restricted.However,the school of left-libertarianism,which belongs to the left-wing camp,advocates accepting self-ownership together with the egalitarian distribution of original external resources.By analyzing the reasons for their differences,it may be concluded that left-wing political philosophy must recognize that self-ownership has an irreplaceable role in preventing infringement,and it is also unconvincing to restrict self-ownership even for the sake of autonomy.

关 键 词：自我所有权 柯亨 左翼自由至上主义 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学] D091