跨境网络侵权诉讼的国际管辖权分配规则研究  

Rule of Assignment of International Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Online Infringement Litigation

作　　者：林洧 LIN Wei

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《国际法学刊》2023年第3期108-132,156,157,共27页Journal of International Law

摘　　要：网络时代不仅给传统的国际管辖权制度带来了新挑战,还促进了国际管辖权制度的自我革新与发展。网络的无边界性与全球性等特征加剧了国际管辖权的冲突,也扩展了国际管辖原因中侵权行为地的内涵。我国过去缺乏网络侵权诉讼的国际管辖权规范,只能类推适用国内管辖权规范进行国际管辖权的认定;欧美则通过相关立法与判例构建国际管辖权规则体系,并在相关司法实践中不断发展与细化国际管辖权的认定标准。基于此,我国应在尊重网络主权原则的理念下,对跨境网络侵权诉讼的国际管辖利益进行必要的平衡,并健全法院审查国际管辖权的实体规范与程序规范。同时,通过立法论与解释论的倡导,实现国际管辖实质正义的要求。The Internet era not only brings new challenges to the traditional international jurisdiction system,but also promotes the self-innovation and development of the international jurisdiction system.The borderless and global characteristics of the Internet aggravate the conflict of international jurisdiction and expand the connotation of the place of tort in the cause of international jurisdiction.Among them,China lacked the international jurisdiction norms of network tort litigation,which can only be applied by analogy to the domestic jurisdiction norms for the identification of international jurisdiction;Europe and the United States,on the other hand,have established the international jurisdiction rule system through relevant legislation and cases,and continuously developed and refined the determination standards of international jurisdiction in relevant judicial practice.Based on this,our country should respect the principle of network sovereignty,the interests of international jurisdiction of cross-border network tort litigation should be balanced,and improve the substantive and procedural norms of international jurisdiction of the court review.At the same time,through the advocacy of legislation theory and interpretation theory,the demand of substantive justice in international jurisdiction is realized.

关 键 词：国际民事裁判管辖权 跨境网络侵权诉讼 国际私法 不方便法院 国际礼让 网络主权 

分 类 号：D997.3[政治法律—国际法学]