学术论文中互动元话语及作者身份建构对比研究  

A comparative study of interactional metadiscourse and authorial identity construction in academic theses

作　　者：刘国兵[1] 张君兰 LIU Guobing;ZHANG Junlan

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学外国语学院,河南省新乡市453007

出　　处：《语料库语言学》2023年第1期60-71,162,共13页Corpus Linguistics

基　　金：河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目“基于OBE理念的英语专业学生写作教学模式创新研究”(2021SJGLX107)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本研究基于Hyland(2005a)的互动元话语理论和孙莉(2015)的身份建构类别,探讨了中国硕士生与国际期刊作者在应用语言学学术论文中互动元话语的使用特征及运用互动元话语建构身份的异同。研究发现,除介入标记外,中国硕士生在学术写作中使用的互动元话语均少于国际期刊作者。从出现频数来看,两类作者运用互动元话语建构的身份类别从多到少依次为研究者、对话者和评价者。中国硕士生建构的小心建议者身份与国际期刊作者不存在差异,但在自发互动者、他发互动者、评我者、评他者、谨慎发起者和自信研究者等身份建构方面与国际期刊作者存在显著性差异。研究结果可为学术英语写作教学提供有益启示。Based on Hyland’s (2005a) interactional metadiscourse theory and Sun’s (2015) identity categories, this study investigates the features of interactional metadiscourse and the similarities and differences on identity construction by employing interactional metadiscourse in academic theses in applied linguistics between Chinese masters and international journal authors. The research results are that, interactional metadiscourses employed by Chinese masters in academic writing are fewer than by international journal authors, except for engagement markers. In terms of frequency of occurrence, the identities constructed by the two author groups employing interactional metadiscourse are in the descending order of researcher, interactor, and evaluator. No difference is found in the identity of careful advisor constructed by Chinese masters and international journal authors. However, Chinese masters differ significantly from international journal authors in the constructed identities of self-initiated interactor, other-initiated interactor, self-evaluator, other-evaluator, cautious originator, and confident researcher. The research findings could provide beneficial enlightenments for academic English writing teaching.

关 键 词：互动元话语 作者身份建构 学术论文 

分 类 号：H31[语言文字—英语]