机构地区:[1]南京农业大学公共管理学院,南京210095 [2]山东农业大学经济管理学院,泰安271018 [3]南京农业大学不动产研究中心,南京210095 [4]南京农业大学中国资源环境与发展研究院,南京210095
出 处:《资源科学》2023年第6期1153-1167,共15页Resources Science
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(22YJC630132);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2021M691608);国家自然科学基金项目(42101272,42071247)。
摘 要:【目的】本文旨在探索曾经推动经济高速增长的地方政府建设用地配置策略能否继续支撑创新驱动发展,以期为精准优化建设用地配置、提升城市创新能力提供理论依据。【方法】基于价格视角,构建地方政府建设用地配置策略对城市创新影响的理论分析框架,进而采用2007—2019年278个地级市面板数据,构建空间计量模型开展实证分析。【结果】①无论全国还是分区域样本,地方政府建设用地配置策略对城市创新影响均呈现“倒U”型特征,其中,全国层面、东部、中部和西部地区拐点分别出现在商住用地价格和工业用地价格比值为7.89、8.56、7.81、7.11时。②工业用地价格对城市创新的影响在全国及东部地区呈现“倒N”型,在中部和西部地区呈现“正U”型;商住用地价格对城市创新的影响在全国及各区域均呈现“倒U”型。③地方政府建设用地配置策略通过影响工业发展、创新支出、创新人才的规模与效率等方面对城市创新产生不同程度的影响,并且工业用地价格和商住用地价格存在不同的影响机制。【结论】地方政府建设用地配置策略难以持续推动中国创新驱动发展,亟需探索更加高效的市场化配置方式,因时制宜、因地制宜地优化建设用地配置策略来满足创新驱动发展的用地需求。[Objective]This study aimed to explore whether the local governments’construction land allocation strategies,which once promoted China’s high-speed economic growth,can continue to support the country’s innovation-driven development,to realize the goal of precisely optimizing the allocation of construction land and improving the urban innovation ability according to local conditions.[Methods]Based on the perspective of prices,this study constructed an analytical framework for the impact of local governments’construction land allocation strategies on urban innovation,and then used the panel data of 278 prefecture-level cities from 2007 to 2019 to construct a spatial econometric model for empirical analysis.[Results](1)The impact of local governments’construction land allocation strategies on urban innovation presented an inverted U-shaped characteristic in both the national and regional samples.The inflection points of the sample at the national level,eastern,central and western regions occurred when the ratio of the price of commercial and residential land to the price of industrial land were 7.89,8.56,7.81,and 7.11,respectively;(2)The impact of industrial land price on urban innovation showed an inverted N-shape in the whole country and the eastern region,and an positive U-shape in the central and western regions;the impact of commercial and residential land price on urban innovation showed an inverted U-shape in the whole country and all regions;(3)The local governments’construction land allocation strategies had different degrees of influence on urban innovation by affecting the scale and efficiency of industrial development,innovation expenditure,and innovative talents,and there were different mechanisms of influence between industrial land prices and commercial and residential land prices.[Conclusion]It is difficult for local governments’construction land allocation strategies to continuously promote China’s innovation-driven development,so it is urgent to explore more efficient market-oriente
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...