机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学东直门医院呼吸科,北京市100700 [2]北京中医药大学中医学院,北京市100029 [3]北京中医药大学东直门医院推拿疼痛科,北京市100700 [4]北京中医药大学循证医学中心,北京市100029
出 处:《中国全科医学》2024年第2期226-232,共7页Chinese General Practice
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFE0102300)。
摘 要:背景口服中药在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)的治疗中应用广泛,但相关临床试验的结局指标尚未得到统一和规范。目的通过筛选已发表的以口服中药为AECOPD治疗措施的随机对照试验(RCT),总结其文献特征和选用的结局指标情况,为中医药治疗AECOPD临床试验设计和结局指标选择提供参考。方法计算机检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、ClinicalTrials.gov、中国临床试验注册中心,获取口服中药治疗AECOPD的RCT和临床试验注册方案,检索时限为2018年1月—2022年10月。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料后,采用定性分析的方法,对纳入研究的结局指标选择情况进行描述。结果纳入578篇文献,包含574篇已报告试验结果的RCT及4个临床试验注册方案。574篇RCT共纳入51508例患者。88篇文献在纳入标准中限定了患者的疾病分级,361篇文献在纳入标准中限定了中医证型,6篇文献报告了盲法,6篇文献提及了随访。纳入文献共涉及4030个结局指标,单篇文献结局指标数量范围为1~24个。按照结局指标的功能属性,将其归为8个指标域:中医症状/证候、症状/体征、理化检测、生活质量、远期预后、经济学评估、安全性评价、其他,报告率最高的指标域是理化检测,报告频次排名前5位的结局指标项目是:有效率(11.5%)、第1秒用力呼气容积(7.5%)、中医症状/证候评分(7.0%)、第1秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(6.8%)、用力肺活量(4.6%)。445篇文献报告了有效率的组成,报告率排名前5位的研究指标依次为症状(423篇)、体征(281篇)、中医证候评分(203篇)、实验室检查(89篇)、肺功能(71篇)。结论口服中药治疗AECOPD的RCT涉及的结局指标数量多、范围广,纳入的文献在不同程度上关注了口服中药对AECOPD患者的症状体征、理化检测Background Oral traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)has been widely used in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD),but the outcome measures of relevant clinical trials have not been standardized and regulated.Objective To screen the published randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of oral TCM in the treatment of AECOPD,summarize the literature characteristics and outcome measures,so as to provide reference for the design of clinical trials and the selection of outcome measures for the treatment of AECOPD with TCM.Methods CNKI,Wanfang Data,VIP,SinoMed,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were systematically searched by computer to obtain RCTs and clinical trial registration protocols for the treatment of AECOPD with oral TCM from January 2018 to October 2022.After independent screening of the literature and extraction of data by 2 researchers,qualitative analysis was used to describe the selection of outcome measures in the enrolled studies.Results A total of 578 studies were enrolled,including 574 RCTs with reported trial results and 4 clinical trial registration protocols.A total of 51508 patients were involved in 574 RCTs.In the inclusion criteria,88 studies limited the classification of disease,and 361 studies limited the TCM syndrome type,6 studies reported the blinding method,and 6 studies mentioned the follow-up.A total of 4030 outcome measures were covered and the number of outcome measures in a single article ranged from 1 to 24.According to the functional attributes,the outcome measures were classified into 8 measure domains:TCM symptoms/syndromes,symptoms/signs,physical and chemical tests,quality of life,long-term prognosis,economic evaluation,safety evaluation and others.The measure domain with the highest reporting rate was physical and chemical tests,and the top 5 outcome measure items reported in terms of frequency were:response rate(11.5%),forced expiratory volume in 1 s(FEV1)(7.5%),TCM symptom/syn
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...