检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹振 Cao Zhen
出 处:《行政与法》2023年第8期115-128,共14页Administration and Law
基 金:国家社科基金项目“19世纪法国航行记录中我国南海维权证据整理与研究”,项目编号:21VJXG006;河南省社科规划项目“公共财政视角下政府奖励立法研究”,项目编号:2021BFX012。
摘 要:随着知识产权重要性的不断提升,知识产权行政裁决被确立为知识产权行政保护的主要方式。当前,我国知识产权行政裁决主要适用于专利侵权纠纷,知识产权行政裁决法律规范逻辑基本固定,但程序规则尚未立法确认。从地方实践来看,知识产权行政裁决存在立法质量差、谦抑性不足、参与性不强、事责不匹配、专业性不够等问题。2023年新一轮党和国家机构改革对知识产权行政管理体制改革作出安排,释放了机构优化信号,明确了知识产权行政管理部门强化权利保护、服务供给、裁决准司法性和成本控制的功能定位。为此,需要在促进知识产权行政裁决框架立法基础上,从统筹设置行政裁决机构及权限配置、完善行政裁决正当程序规则、加强行政裁决与司法程序衔接以及促进专业人才内生型系统培养等方面入手,增强知识产权行政裁决结果的公正性和公信力。With the increasing importance of intellectual property rights(IPR),administrative adjudication of IPR has been established as the main way of administrative protection of IPR.Currently,China's IPR administrative adjudication mainly applies to patent infringement disputes,and the logic of IPR administrative adjudication legal norms is basically fixed,but the procedural rules have not yet been confirmed by legislation.From the perspective of local practice,IPR administrative adjudication suffers from poor legislative quality,insufficient modesty,weak participation,mismatch of matters and responsibilities,and insufficient professionalism,etc.ln 2023,the new round of Party and State institutional reform made arrangements for the reform of the IPR administrative management sys-tem,releasing the signal of institutional optimization and clarifying the IPR administrative departments'strengthen-ing of rights protection,service supply,adjudication quasi-judiciality and cost The function of intellectual property administrative departments is to strengthen the protection of rights,service provision,quasi-judicial adjudication and cost control.To this end,it is necessary to enhance the fairness and credibility of the results of IPR adminis-trative adjudication based on promoting the legislation on the framework of IPR administrative adjudication,setting up administrative adjudication institutions and allocating their authority in an integrated manner,improving the rules of due process for administrative adjudication,strengthening the articulation between administrative adjudica-tion and judicial procedures,and promoting the endogenous system of cultivating professional talents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.228.247