恶意抢注商标与在先权利冲突的司法解决路径研究  

Research on the Judicial Solution of the Conflict between Malicious Trademark Registration and Prior Rights

作　　者：孙那 鲍一鸣 Sun Wa;Bao Yiming

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学法学院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2023年第7期4-14,共11页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：知识产权具备私权和公共政策性的双重属性,商标恶意抢注行为屡禁不止,攀附和不当利用在先权利不仅侵犯了私权,而且影响了消费者和诚信经营者的公共利益,浪费了大量司法行政资源,严重阻碍我国从商标大国向商标品牌强国的转变进程。《商标法》的改革既要加强正向引导,通过规范商标使用行为以避免商标闲置和资源浪费;又要严格反向规制,重点打击商标囤积和恶意抢注等行为。最新《商标法修订草案》引入了商标强制转移规则的同时有必要划分适用场景和细化构成要件。建议进一步明确商标注销、无效和强制转移各自适用条件,构建商标立法规则、行政审查和司法裁判立体保护体系。Intellectual property rights have the dual attributes of private rights and public policy,and the malicious registration of trademarks is repeatedly prohibited.The behavior of grabbing and improper use of prior rights not only infringes on private rights,but also affects public interests such as consumers and honest operators,wastes a lot of judicial and administrative resources,and will seriously hinder China's transformation from a trademark power to a trademark and brand power.The reform of Trademark Law should not only strengthen the positive guidance,but also avoid the idle trademark and the waste of resources by standardizing the use of trademark.It is also necessary to strictly reverse regulations,focusing on combating trademark hoarding and malicious squatting.The latest draft amendment to the Trademark Law introduces the compulsory transfer rules of trademarks,and it is necessary to divide the application scenarios and refine the constituent elements.The focus is on clarifying the respective applicable conditions for trademark cancellation,invalidation and forced transfer,and building a three-dimensional protection system for trademark legislative rules,administrative review and judicial judgment.

关 键 词：商标恶意抢注 在先权利 权利冲突 商标强制转移 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]