检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗祎楠 Luo Yinan
出 处:《中国社会科学》2023年第8期34-59,205,共27页Social Sciences in China
摘 要:在充满纷争的人类政治世界中,如何处理分歧是任何政治体都必须回应的问题。“个体主义”视角强调行动者会采取排斥乃至消除分歧诉求的手段,以达到对利益、权力地位或是法定政策理念的控制独占。中国传统士大夫政治的丰富历史经验为超越此种视角的局限提供了可能。作为新的历史阐释视角,从“天下情势”角度能够揭示被“个体主义”思维遮蔽的中国政治文明的独特实践逻辑和动力机制。北宋熙宁初年的“青苗法事件”由此得以呈现未能被既有研究充分重视的历史情态。How to deal with differences is a question that any political body must respond to.The"individualist"perspective emphasizes that actors will adopt measures to exclude or even eliminate divergent claims in order to gain control over interests,power,or statutory policy,but the rich experience of traditional Chinese scholarofficials offers the possibility of going beyond the limitations of this perspective.The perspective of the reality and trends of""all under heaven"(tianzia),as a new narrative,reveals a unique practical logic and dynamic mechanism in Chinese political civilization that have been overlooked by the individualist perspective.The green sprouts policy(qingmiaofa)debate in the early years of the New Policies era of the Northern Song dynasty(960-1127)presents a historical situation that has not been given full attention by existing research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.222.110