检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵洁[1] 常红[1] 刘梦娆 李苏爱 ZHAO Jie;CHANG Hong;LIU Mengrao;LI Su'ai(Department of Neurology,Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University,Beijing,100053,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学宣武医院神经内科,北京市100053
出 处:《中国护理管理》2023年第9期1388-1393,共6页Chinese Nursing Management
基 金:2022年北京市卫生健康科技成果和适宜技术项目(BHTPP2022084);北京市医院管理中心培育计划项目(PG2022016)。
摘 要:目的:对医院环境下可穿戴生命体征监护技术接受的相关研究进行范围综述,为未来该领域的研究提供参考。方法:依据乔安娜布里格斯研究所范围综述方法学框架,检索国内外数据库中有关可穿戴生命体征监护的技术接受研究,对纳入文献进行汇总和分析。结果:纳入14篇文献,研究结果显示在医院环境下可穿戴生命体征监测技术接受呈中等及以上水平;多种术语与技术接受相关,包括“可接受性”“体验”“可用性”和“满意度”;研究的理论框架主要包括技术接受模型和行为改变轮模型,研究变量及工具尚不统一;技术接受的影响因素包括技术、人、环境三方面。结论:目前,医院环境下可穿戴生命体征监护技术接受研究的评价方法尚未统一。建议未来将时间维度纳入技术接受评价中,建立统一的术语和评估框架,以促进该领域研究间的比较,为临床应用提供依据。Objective:We conducted this scoping review aiming to explore the acceptability of monitoring vital signs using smart wearable devices within hospital setting,providing clues for future practice.Methods:According to the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology framework,we searched domestic and foreign databases for technical acceptance studies on wearable vital signs monitoring,and summarized and analyzed related literature.Results:A total of 14 articles were included in this study.Our results showed that the acceptability level of monitoring vital signs using smart wearable technologies in hospital settings was medium and beyond.Several terminology and definitions were associated with technological acceptance,including'acceptability','experience','usability'and'satisfaction'.The research variables and tools were not uniform due to different theoretical frameworks in various studies.We found that influencing factors of technological acceptance included technology,personnel and environment.Conclusion:The definition and usage of intelligent wearable vital sign monitoring technology in hospital settings are inconsistent.Technical acceptance should be considered as a phased process in the future.It is also suggested to construct a unified definition and evaluation framework,to promote the comparison of research in this field and provide clues for clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.209.87