检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑春荣[1] 叶思雨 Zheng Chunrong;Ye Siyu
机构地区:[1]同济大学德国问题研究所/欧盟研究所,200092 [2]同济大学外国语学院,200092
出 处:《国际政治研究》2023年第3期9-30,5,共23页The Journal of International Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大研究专项(项目批准号:20VGQ011)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:欧盟共同移民与庇护政策是欧洲一体化的重要组成部分,2015年的欧洲难民危机暴露出该政策的诸多缺陷,此后欧盟寻求改革却屡陷困境。依据后功能主义理论,欧盟成员国的民族国家身份认同与欧盟认同兼容性有限,在面对欧盟外国家移民群体时,排斥性的民族国家身份认同更是占据主导。因此,欧盟始终难以健全既公正团结又稳定灵活的共同移民与庇护政策体系。俄乌冲突爆发后,成员国积极接纳与安置乌克兰难民,实际上是对乌克兰公民展现出包容性的民族国家身份认同。欧盟为了提高区域内部政策一致性,在移民和难民问题上或许只能突出欧盟内外分界,共同移民与庇护政策在未来也会愈发侧重外部解决路径。The European Union’s common migration and asylum policy is one of the key policy domains of European integration.The 2015 refugee crisis revealed many shortcomings of EU’s migration and asylum policy,which has since been consistently plagued by difficulties in seeking reform.Post-functionalist theories suggest that the limited compatibility between national identity and European identity,and the dominance of national identity in EU countries’dealing with migrants from non-EU states are the main reasons why the EU has been struggling to develop a common migration and asylum policy that is fair and cohesive,and at the same time stable and flexible.Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict,EU members have actively accepted and resettled large numbers of Ukrainian refugees,demonstrating the inclusiveness of national identity to the Ukrainians.To improve policy coherence,the European Union may have to distinguish between the migrants from EU states and those from non-EU states.It is likely that EU’s common migration and asylum policy will increasingly focus on external solutions in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33