Defending Inalienable Right:Response to Three Critical Propositions  

作　　者：赵树坤 余庆 CHANG Guohua ZHAO Shukun;YU Qing

机构地区：[1]Southwest University of Political Science and Law(SWUPL) [2]the School of Administrative Law,SWUPL [3]不详

出　　处：《The Journal of Human Rights》2023年第2期422-443,共22页人权（英文版）

基　　金：a phased result of the important project“A Research of General Secretary Xi Jinping’s Important Statement on Respecting and Safeguarding Human Rights”(No.228ZD004);supported by National Social Science Fund of China;the SWUPL student scientific research innovation project of 2021(No.2021XZXS-070)。

摘　　要：To defend the explanatory power of the choice theory of rights,choice theorists have put forward the impossibility theorem,the proposition of moral priority,and the redundancy theory of rights to deny the existence of inalienable rights.However,the impossibility theorem confuses power and privilege and breaks through basic legal relations;the proposition of moral priority shifts from the importance of rights to the absoluteness of rights by refusing to recognize the“threshold”of rights;the redundancy theory of rights ignores the“severity increasing effect”of rights.Therefore,the accusation made by choice theorists is groundless.

关 键 词：RIGHTS inalienable HOHFELD normative power 

分 类 号：D909.1[政治法律—法学理论] D034.5[政治法律—法学]