The Four Categories of Chinese Discourse on Human Rights and Their Interrelationships  

作　　者：常健 LI Donglin CHANG Jian

机构地区：[1]Centre for the Study of Human Rights(National Human Rights Edu-cation and Training Base)at Nankai University [2]Zhou Enlai School of Government Management,Nankai University [3]不详

出　　处：《The Journal of Human Rights》2023年第3期493-511,共19页人权（英文版）

基　　金：a phased outcome of the research project“Research on the Practice of Human Rights in China Promoting and Enriching Shared Values for All Humanity”funded by the National Social Science Fund of China under project approval No.22ZDA127。

摘　　要：In China,the main discourse on human rights can be classified into four categories:political discourse,policy discourse,institutional discourse,and academic discourse.These four categories show significant differences in terms of the context,content,mode of expression,characteristics,and functions of the discourse.They cannot be simply equated or interchangeable with one another.However,they also rely on,restrict,and promote each other,and under certain conditions,they can be transformed into one another.It is needed to prevent imbalances,mismatches in context,isolation,and inadequate translation among human rights discourses.Meanwhile,it is essential to promote balanced development among different discourses,where each discourse maintains its own boundaries,refers to one another,and undergoes accurate translation,in order to construct their healthy interrelationships.Exploring appropriate methods of translation between discourses is an important and worthwhile topic for research in Chinese human rights discourse.It holds significant practical significance and academic value in constructing the Chinese human rights discourse system.

关 键 词：political discourse on human rights policy discourse on human rights institutional discourse on human rights academic discourse on human rights INTERDISCURSIVITY 

分 类 号：D621.5[政治法律—政治学]