档案来源观的后现代转向  

The postmodern Turn of the Principle of Provenance

作　　者：连志英[1] 蒋玲[2] 张晓 LIAN Zhiying;JIANG Ling;ZHANG Xiao(School of Information Resource Management,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;Evaluation Research Center,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;Aero Engine Corporation of China,Beijing 100097,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学信息资源管理学院,北京100872 [2]中国人民大学评价研究中心,北京100872 [3]中国航空发动机集团有限公司,北京100097

出　　处：《档案学通讯》2023年第5期4-10,共7页Archives Science Bulletin

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“我国社群档案记忆建构与传承研究”(20BTQ101)。

摘　　要：传统档案来源观是现代理性主义的产物,受后现代主义思潮的影响,后现代档案学者对基于现代理性主义的传统来源观的认识论进行了解构,对传统来源观否定文件形成过程中所涉及主体的主体地位和能动性进行了反思,并对传统来源观将情感排除在外进行了批判,档案来源观由此出现了后现代转向,即由“实体来源”转向“概念来源”,由“形成环节来源”转向“文件全生命周期来源”,由“单一机构形成者”转向“多元主体形成者”。档案来源观的后现代转向体现了人本思想,为多元主体参与档案治理提供了理论依据,对于实现档案资源智慧化开发与服务具有重要的指导意义。Traditional provenance principle is the product of modern rationalism.Influenced by postmodernism,postmodern archival scholars deconstructed the epistemology of traditional provenance principle,reflected on the denial of the subjective status and agency of the subjects involved in the process of records creation and criticized the principle for excluding affect,thus bringing about postmodern turn of provenance principle,that is,provenance has turned from entity provenance to conceptual provenance,from creation stage to the whole record lifecycle,from single institution creator to multiple creators.The postmodern turn of provenance principle reflects humanism in archival field,provides theoretical basis for the participation of multiple agents in archival governance,and is also a guiding principle to actualize the intelligent development and service of archival resources in the age of digital intelligence.

关 键 词：来源 来源原则 文件形成者 共同形成者 

分 类 号：G279.3[文化科学—档案学]