检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚远梅 YAO Yuanmei
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学历史学系、社会主义历史与文献研究院,200241
出 处:《历史教学问题》2023年第4期15-25,210,共12页History Research And Teaching
基 金:研究项目(20BSS033,21&ZD243,2021MZD013)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:关于中印边界问题东段,诸多学者进行研究,但是从英帝国整体扩张视角的研究还比较薄弱。本文基于大量英印档案及地图资料,系统梳理英国在维护其英帝国利益驱动下,在逐步蚕食中国领土主权利益基础上,多渠道推进“科学边疆”扩张战略,以构建保护其印度殖民地安全的多重防线,由此多部门协同精心炮制“麦克马洪线”,以及英国明知因中国政府不接受西姆拉条约导致“麦克马洪线”不合法的情况下又如何处理该线,从而埋下祸根;印度独立后如何继承该线,进而导致中印边界问题东段形成的过程,努力揭开一些被英印蓄意掩藏的历史真相。Many scholars have studied the eastern section of the Sino-Indian border issue,but few researched it from the perspective of the overall expansion of the British Empire.In view of this,based on a large number of British and Indian archives and maps,this article tries to explore how Britain promoted to establish multi-layer defense lines,which was called the"scientific frontier",for its Indian colonies by multiple means,driven under the impetus of securing the interests of the British Empire and encroaching on the interests of China's territorial sovereignty.Correspondingly,the"McMahon Line"was carefully concocted by multiple British departments.The article also explores how the British authorities dealt with the"McMahon Line"while they learned clearly that the line was illegal because the Chinese government did not accept the Simla Treaty,which planted the root of border dispute.In addition,the article investigates how the new Government of India inherited the line after India's independence,which then led to the eastern section of the Sino-Indian border issue.All in all,this paper strives to uncover some historical truths that were deliberately concealed by Britain and India.
分 类 号:D823[政治法律—政治学] D822.335.1[政治法律—外交学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15