检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯常洁 Feng Changjie(Research Center of Economy of the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心,重庆400067
出 处:《西部经济管理论坛》2023年第5期71-79,共9页West Forum on Economy and Management
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划项目“重庆构建全域现代生态工业体系研究”(2019WT51);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心课题“成渝地区双城经济圈高质量发展的绿色政策模拟及优化研究”(KFJJ2022046)。
摘 要:开展用能权有偿使用和交易试点,对探索如何通过市场机制促进节能降耗,以较低成本实现能耗“双控”目标有重要意义。本文利用2006—2019年省级面板数据,运用双重差分法检验用能权交易制度的实施对区域能源消费强度的影响。研究结果表明,用能权交易制度的实施能够有效降低省域能源消费强度。具体而言,用能权交易制度的实施使试点省份能源消费强度下降了7.47%左右。同时,各种控制变量对省域能源消费强度的影响具有显著差异:经济发展水平每提高1%,可以显著地促进省域能源消费强度下降0.781%;产业结构每优化1%,可以使省域能源消费强度下降0.454%;对外开放水平每提高1%,可以促进省域能源消费强度下降0.033%;研发投入每增加1%,可以使省域能源消费强度提高0.152%;人口规模每增大1%,会使省域能源消费强度提高0.06%。此外,通过中介效应分析发现,用能权交易制度可以通过提升技术创新水平来降低省域能源消费强度。This article utilizes the provincial panel data from 2006 to 2019 and the difference-in-difference method to test the impact of the implementation of energy rights trading policy on regional energy consumption intensity.The results of the study show that the implementation of the energy trading policy can effectively reduce the provincial energy intensity.Specifically,the implementation of the energy rights trading system has led to a reduction of approximately 7.47%in energy consumption intensity in pilot provinces.Meanwhile,the effects of various control variables on provincial energy intensity have significant differences,including when the level of economic development increases by 1%,it can significantly contribute to a 0.781%decrease in energy intensity;when the industrial structure is optimized by 1%,it can make the pilot provinces'energy intensity decrease by 0.454%;when the level of external opening increases by 1%,it can contribute to a 0.033%decrease in energy intensity or so.However,there is a positive relationship between provincial energy intensity and R&D investment and population size,a 1%increase in R&D investment will lead to a 0.152%increase in energy intensity and a 1%increase in population size will lead to a 0.06%increase in energy intensity in the pilot provinces.In addition,the intermediary effect analysis reveals that the energy trading policy reduces energy intensity by increasing the level of technological innovation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7