民法典人格权编的规范功能与司法适用  

The Normative Function and Law Application of the Personality Right Compilation in the Civil Code

作　　者：刘凯湘[1] LIU Kaixiang

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第8期34-47,共14页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：《民法典》生效后,对人格权编的争论从“立法论”转向“解释论”,但就人格权编价值和意义的讨论仍未终结。在《民法典》时代,民法学者的讨论应更多关注司法实践与法律的实际适用,使学者的智慧与实务工作者的智慧相结合以共同促进法律发挥作用。从司法保护的视角来看,司法实践中形成了区分救济项目分别适用《民法典》第995条或侵权责任编相关条款、用具体人格权条款进行权利界定、用一般人格权条款实现“法官造法”的清晰思路,该思路具备理论上的依据,体现了人格权编的权利保护功能、权利确定功能,以及为人格权司法保护提供了开放空间的功能,这些功能充分体现了人格权编所具有的现实价值。After the Civil Code came into effect,the debate on the part of personality rights has shifted from the theory of legislation to the theory of interpretation,but the discussion on the value and significance of the part of personality rights has not yet ended.In the era of the Civil Code,civil law scholars should pay more attention to the judicial practice and the actual law application,so that the wisdom of scholars and practitioners could get together to promote the effect of law.From the perspective of judicial protection,the judicial practice has formed a clear idea of applying Article 995 of the Civil Code or the relevant provisions of the Tort Liability Book separately to different claim items,defining the rights with the provisions of specific personality rights,and realizing the Judicial Lawmaking with the provisions of general personality rights,which has a theoretical basis.The idea reflects the function of protecting rights and determining rights of the part of personality rights,and provides open space for judicial protection of personality rights,which truly reflects the practical value of the personality rights.

关 键 词：人格权请求权 法律适用 诉讼时效 司法保护 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]