刑法介入基因编辑技术的限度——以《刑法修正案(十一)》为视域的考察  

The Limitation of Criminal Law Intervention in Genome Editing Technology--Examination from the perspective of the eleventh amendment to the criminal law

作　　者：郑二威 ZHENG Er-wei(School of Law,Wuhan University)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院

出　　处：《科学与社会》2023年第3期105-126,共22页Science and Society

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“犯罪化的理论体系与实践机制研究”(21AFX010)。

摘　　要：基因编辑对人类具有诸多利益,但也蕴藏着无限危险。刑法是否应介入基因编辑技术,在立法时各执一端,其中既有利益与风险的考量,也有刑法谦抑性价值的抉择。《刑法修正案(十一)》在此基础上确立了非法植入基因编辑、克隆胚胎罪。正确适用该罪,须考量立法过程中的争议因素,确定本罪保护的法益是人类自然生殖利益,明确罪名中的“非法”对应于“合法”的内涵,同时还要把握具体的三种行为类型的实质,对符合罪量要素的“情节严重”综合考察,实现司法过程中的准确适用。Genome editing brings many benefits for human beings,but also contains infinite dangers.Whether criminal law should be involved in genome editing technology or not,there are both considerations of interests and risks,and the choice of criminal law's modest value.On this basis,the Criminal Law Amendment(XI)established the crime of illegally implanting genome editing and cloning embryos.To apply this crime correctly,it is necessary to consider controversial factors in the legislative process,determine that the legal interest protected by this crime is the natural reproductive interests of human beings,clarify the connotation of"illegal"in the charge corresponding to"legal",and also grasp the essence of the specific three types of behavior.A comprehensive examination of the"serious circumstances"that meet the elements of the crime quantity should be conducted to achieve accurate application in the judicial process.

关 键 词：基因编辑 犯罪化 保护法益 行为类型 情节严重 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学]