行政信赖保护原则的要件适用研究  

Research on the Application of Administrative Trust Protection Principle

作　　者：卢政峰 张墩 LU Zheng-feng;ZHANG Dun(School of Marine Law and Humanities,Dalian Ocean University,Dalian,Liaoning 116023)

机构地区：[1]大连海洋大学海洋法律与人文学院,辽宁大连116023

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第3期41-48,95,共9页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅项目“政府特许经营协议在履行中的法律问题研究”(LJKFR20220245);辽宁省社会科学基金项目“新时代国家征收法律制度的创新发展的重大理论与实践问题研究”(L21BFX004)。

摘　　要：信赖保护原则肇始于德国公法领域,在审判中逐步构建了以三要件为主的逻辑构造,并为大陆法系学者所推崇适用。但作为法治建设的舶来品,其并未厚植于我国本土制度体系。在构成要件的设定上,无论是传统的三要件说亦或四要件说,均无法满足纠纷解决以及立法补缺的需要;在法律位阶的准据上,其是作为部门法原则亦或作为宪法性原则的模糊性,亦左右着实务适用的价值取向,难以形成统一的规范指引。本文通过对信赖保护原则理论的检视,循基本权利保障说为依托建构信赖保护原则之宪法性位阶地位,以完善的“四要件说”替代传统“三要件”说,证成信赖基础的偏离于构成要件中的引介,以期推动行政信赖保护原则要件适用体系的完善。With its origin in German public law,the trust protection principle has developed a logic structure of three elements,and is recommended and applied by scholars of civil law system.But as an importation,it is not deeply rooted in Chinese legal system.The setting of constitutive elements,whether traditional three-element theory or four-element theory,can not meet the needs of dispute resolution and legislation;and in the legal ranking of the evidence,the ambiguity of whether it is a principle of departmental law or a constitutional principle also influences its value orientation and makes it difficult to form a unified normative guidance.By examining relevant theories,this paper constructs the constitutional rank status of trust protection principle based on the theory of fundamental rights protection,replaces the traditional three-element theory with the perfect four-element theory,and proves that the foundation of trust deviates from the introduction of the constitutive requirements,in order to perfect the application system of the trust protection principle.

关 键 词：位阶冲突 构成要件 信赖基础的偏离 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]