检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屠凯[1] Tu Kai
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院
出 处:《人权》2023年第4期104-125,共22页Human Rights
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“完善特别行政区司法制度和法律体系研究”(项目批准号:23ZDA121)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:在中国内地和中国香港、中国澳门两特别行政区实施宪法、基本法的过程中,作为宪制层面基本权利的“家庭生活”(特别是其涉及亲子关系的部分)的核心内容,最终都被有权机关认定为“家庭成员之间的紧密联系”。内地和港澳有权机关在基本权利解释上的趋同,至少就“家庭生活”而言,究其根本,是因为在相似的社会、经济、人口条件下,受到国际人权法的影响,在对基本权利核心内容的理解上达成了共识。以此类解释趋同为基础,中国公民在内地和港澳所享基本权利未来不应再有明显差异。In the course of implementing the Constitution and the Basic Law in the Chinese mainland and the Hong Kong and Macao special administrative regions(SARs),the core content of"family life"(especially the part involving the parent-child relationship),which is a basic right at the constitutional level,has finally been recognized by the competent authorities as"close ties between family members".The convergent interpretation of basic rights by com-petent authorities in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong&Macao SARs,at least in terms of"family life",is fundamentally due to the fact that under similar social,economic and popula-tion conditions,they have reached a consensus on understanding the core content of basic rights under the influence of international human rights law.On the basis of this convergent interpreta-tion,there should be no longer significant differences in the basic rights enjoyed by Chinese citizens between the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong&Macao SARs.
分 类 号:D921.9[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.209