镇域纠纷运动二重性:隆镇土地纷争及其协调失败的法律民族志  

The Duality of Dispute Movements in the Township Field:A Legal Ethnography of Land Disputes in Longtown and Its Failed Coordination

作　　者：曾令健[1] Zeng Lingjian

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学

出　　处：《中国不动产法研究》2023年第1期173-203,共31页Research on Real Estate Law of China

基　　金：2021年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“民法典民族性表达与制度供给研究”(21JZD033);广东省哲学社会科学规划2021年度一般项目“民俗信仰的法源地位与民法典权利对标”(GD21CFX06);重庆市社科基金青年项目“乡村振兴进程中的纠纷解决及其治法保障”(2020QNXF11)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：一桩土地纷争的法律民族志表明,镇域纠纷运动是一个复杂的综合体。在镇域与纠纷运动的互动关系中,最为显著者莫过于镇域纠纷运动二重性:镇(乡)所在物理时空、生活与生产方式、社会观念、个体认知与激情、正式与非正式规则、日常实践与偶发事件等物质及意识,构成纠纷运动的场域/结构,纠纷运动既是镇域在个案中之特定呈现,也对场域/结构之存在形态产生反作用,纠纷运动及其效应更是作为场域/结构之一部分而沉淀于镇域中,往复不止。镇域纠纷运动二重性集中体现为支配与反抗、资源与局限、架构与形塑等彼此依存、相互转化的关系。The legal ethnography of a land dispute shows that the township field dispute movement is a complex synthesis.In the interaction between the township field and the dispute movement,there is nothing more significant than the duality of the dispute movement in the township field:the physical space and time in which the township(village)is located,the way of life and production,social concept,individual perceptions and passions,formal and informal rules,daily practices and occasional events,and other material and consciousness constitute the field/structure of the dispute movement,which is the specific presentation of the township field in each case and also has a counter effect on the existence form of the field/structure,and the dispute movement and its effects are precipitated in the township field as part of the field/structure,and it goes on and on.The duality of dispute movement in the township is reflected in the interdependence and transformation of domination and resistance,resources and limitations,structure and shape,etc.

关 键 词：土地纷争 镇域 纠纷运动 二重性 法律民族志 

分 类 号：D922.3[政治法律—法学]