指向治国理政的国家能力研究:以现实为观照  

A Research on State Capacity Based on Political Practice and State Governing

作　　者：江天雨 Jiang Tianyu

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学,北京100191

出　　处：《上海行政学院学报》2023年第5期58-68,共11页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute

基　　金：2021年度国家社科基金青年项目“马克思主义政治话语体系在中国的形成与发展研究”(21CKS008);中央高校基本科研业务费资助,北京航空航天大学2023年度人文社科青年骨干项目“中国式现代化进程中的国家能力建设研究”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：国家能力本来是一种实践性知识,却有了纯粹作为概念研究、脱离指导实践的研究倾向,这背离了国家理论诞生的初衷,国家能力研究应该立足于治国理政而彰显其价值。从历时维度上厘清国家能力研究脉络可以发现,现代化研究中“国家”这一关键角色历经了“发现”“祛除”“回归”与“再消失”,即国家能力源自“后发”国家赶超发展的现实需要,但很多时候仅停留于学术概念之中甚至淹没于治理理念中。作为一种因时因地的实践性知识,纯粹概念研究层面上的国家能力理论无法真正实现其治国理政的指导性作用。与之相对的是,因为“致治”的历史文化传统,中国的国家能力研究的学术价值和实践价值并行不悖,这彰显了中国历史与实践的理论富矿意义。State capacity is a kind of knowledge born to lead the political practice.However,contemporary studies on state capacity tends to have the characteristic which is from notion to notion.It strays from the original intentions of state capacity theory,which emphasized that the state capacity should show its value and effects as a kind of guide to govern a state.It can be easily found out that the role of state is very complicated because of the process from discovering,vanishing,throwback and disappearing again during modernization research if we look through the history and have a diachronic study.In fact,the state capacity theory was born in the needs of some countries'surpassing development so that it should not stay at the conceptional level,but should go back to its tradition which is a kind of circumstantial knowledge,otherwise it will lose its value on directing practice.It should be noticed that in China the state capacity theory gives the consideration both on practice and notion.It may be related to the historical genes and inspire us the theoretical value of Chinese history and practice.

关 键 词：国家能力 后发优势 发展型国家 政治秩序 时间性 

分 类 号：D61[政治法律—政治学]