编者自我批评言语行为的修辞策略--以《人民文学》为例  

Rhetorical strategies of editors'self-criticism acts:A case study of The People's Literature

作　　者：董瑞兰 Dong Ruilan

机构地区：[1]闽江学院人文学院

出　　处：《西安外国语大学学报》2023年第3期17-21,63,共6页Journal of Xi’an International Studies University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学基金项目“广义修辞学视域中的《人民文学》话语研究(2000—2020)”(项目编号:21YJC751006)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：编者自我批评言语行为是学术界很少论及的话题。本文运用广义修辞学理论观察《人民文学》的这些行为的语用修辞策略,研究发现:其自我批评的“检讨”行为包含自我批评的语义真值,并在人称使用、否定语词和“过去—现在—将来”时间模式中完成语用意义建构;其“道歉”行为的信息框架主要包括道歉方的公开主动性和道歉辅助策略的使用,并发挥了表意、情感与修复等语用功能;其“更正”行为是一种象征性仪式,它有特定的话语模式,而且其致歉语与致谢语连用的策略降低了交际双方面子威胁。道歉行为的背后隐藏着编者深深的愧疚感,以及中国文化语境中主体行为背后的语用认知与思维模式。希望本文在跨学科视野中为文学期刊话语修辞研究提供一种新思路。Editors'self-criticism as a speech act is rarely discussed in academic circles.Based on broad-sense rhetoric,this article observes the rhetorical strategies of these behaviors in The People's Literature,and finds that the self-critical"review"act of the editors contains the semanticity of self-criticism,and completes the pragmatic construction in the person-deixis choice,negative words and the“past-present-future”time mode,that the information framework of“apology”acts mainly in-cludes the public initiative of the apologizing party and the use of auxiliary apologetic strategies,playing the pragmatic func-tions of ideography,emotion and repair etc.,and that the“correction”act is a symbolic ceremony with a specific discourse pattern,whose strategy of combining apology and acknowledgement reduces the face threat for both parties.Behind the apology acts there lies the editors'deep sense of guilt as well as the pragmatic cognition and thinking mode of the subject behavior within the Chinese cultural context.It is hoped that this article can provide a new way of thinking for the study of discourse rhetoric in literary journals from an interdisciplinary perspective.

关 键 词：《人民文学》 自我批评 道歉 语用策略 广义修辞学 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]