检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张途 Zhang Tu
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学法学院
出 处:《法学》2023年第10期20-32,共13页Law Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“当代西方政治哲学中政治决定的正当性研究”(项目号:20CZX047)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:法官对一般案件负有“依法裁判”的义务,对疑难案件需要作出建立在政治道德共识基础上的“正当裁判”。在疑难案件中,除非将法官的裁判结论等同于“什么是法律”,否则无论法官“越法裁判”进行自由裁量,还是依靠法律解释,都超越了法教义学标准中的法律在进行正当裁判。正当裁判之所以能超越依法裁判,是因为两者本质融贯,即司法裁判的本质目标就是正当裁判,依法裁判是实现正当裁判不可或缺的手段。法的安定性有助于呈现这一融贯关系。依法裁判能充分实现法的安定性,因为大部分时候法官正是通过依法裁判维系一个在政治道德上相对合理可靠的社会秩序。在绝大多数情况下,法官的依法裁判正是建立在正当裁判的前提之上。In general,judges have the duty to adjudicate according to law,yet in hard cases,they need to adjudicate justly based on the consensus of political morality.In hard cases,unless judges' decisions are amounted to “what is law”,otherwise whether they deploy judicial discretion or rely upon legal interpretation,they indeed go beyond legal doctrines and adjudicate justly.Judges can adjudicate justly beyond the boundary of law since these two ways of adjudication are coherent with each other:the goal of adjudication is to make justified decisions,while adjudicating according to law indispensably facilitates that goal.The idea of legal certainty can help illustrate the coherence aforementioned:the biggest merit of adjudicating according to law is for legal certainty,and the reason that adjudicating according to law satisfies legal certainty is that most of the time judges are maintaining a reasonable political society by virtue of following the law.That is to say,normally judges already adjudicate justly by adjudicating according to law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249