等同侵权判定中可预见性规则的理解与适用  

Understanding and Application of the Foreseeability Rule in the Determination of Equivalent Infringement

作　　者：马云鹏 Ma Yunpeng

机构地区：[1]最高人民法院第一巡回法庭综合办公室

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2023年第5期178-189,共12页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“数字化犯罪参与的归责模式研究”(项目编号:21BFX176)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：作为限制等同原则适用的规则之一,“可预见性规则”通过将申请日可以预见但未写入权利要求的技术方案排除在等同范围之外,来达到防止等同侵权滥用和不当扩张专利权的目的。但是,因为法律规则的缺失和裁判标准的摇摆,这一规则始终没有在学理上站稳脚跟,在实践应用中也遭遇了困境。本文从其诞生的本质出发,结合最新司法案例,在对其理论根基进行梳理论证的基础上,尝试对其应然的理解维度和合理的适用规则给出可供参考的建议。As one of the rules limiting the application of the principle of equivalence,the“foreseeability rule”aims to prevent the abuse and improper expansion of patent rights by excluding technical solutions that are foreseeable on the application date but not included in the claims from the scope of equivalence.However,due to the lack of legal rules and the fluctuation of judgment standards,this rule has never established itself firmly in academic theory and has also encountered difficulties in practical application.This article starts from the original intention and essence of its birth,combined with the latest judicial precedents,and on the basis of sorting out and demonstrating its theoretical foundation,attempts to provide reference suggestions for its proper understanding dimension and reasonable application rules.

关 键 词：可预见性规则 等同原则 专利侵权 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]