检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋浩琛 胡宏伟 JIANG Hao-chen;HU Hong-wei(School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;Health Security Research Center,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京100872 [2]中国人民大学健康保障研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2023年第9期64-71,共8页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基 金:中国人民大学2022年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划成果。
摘 要:新加坡是生产主义福利国家的典型代表,始终保持着东亚国家和地区中最低限度的卫生支出,却也依然保有亮眼的卫生绩效。本研究将揭示其如何塑造更有效的卫生福利支出模式。具体而言,新加坡通过筹资侧的个人责任来激发成本意识和提高医疗服务效率,同时,通过供给侧的政府监管来纠正医疗领域的市场失灵,保证为全体居民提供良好且可负担的医疗服务。尽管在人口老龄化等挑战下,政府在卫生福利模式中加入了更多普遍主义的要素,并提供强大的医疗安全网,但其依然只提供最低限度的卫生福利支出,也依然强调个人和家庭对健康的责任。新加坡政府对卫生支出始终保持审慎态度,但通过积极干预和制度设计,政府实际上发挥了比单纯的卫生福利支出更复杂、有效的作用。As a typical example of productive welfare capitalism,Singapore maintains the lowest health expenditure among East Asian countries and regions with impressive health performance.This study aims to discover how such effective health welfare mode can be shaped.Specifically,Singapore uses individual responsibility on the financing side to stimulate cost-consciousness,and improve the efficiency of healthcare services,meanwhile,corrects market failures in healthcare with government regulation on the supply side to ensure good and affordable health care for all residents.Although the government has provided more health benefit and a strong health care safety net in the face of aging population,it still maintains only a minimum expenditure on health benefits and keeps emphasizing individual responsibility for health.Singapore government has always been cautious about health expenditure,but it actually plays a more effective role than simply spending on health benefits through active intervention and institutional design.
关 键 词:生产主义福利体制 卫生支出 卫生治理 整合型医疗服务体系
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.1