清代河西走廊“乌牛坝水案”中的官方应对  

The Official Response in the“Wuniu Dam Water Dispute Case”of Hexi Corridor in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：潘春辉[1,2] Pan Chunhui

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学历史文化学院,730070 [2]中国历史研究院“田澍工作室”

出　　处：《中国边疆史地研究》2023年第3期149-157,243,244,共11页China's Borderland History and Geography Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“明清以来祁连山地区的用水机制与地方秩序研究”(19BZS095)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：清代河西走廊“乌牛坝水案”中,官方在判词与实断之间采取折中之术,一方面在言辞中斥责乌牛坝之强抢,并对其进行惩戒,却在实际裁断中不断对其让步;另一方面,官府在判词中对高头坝予以怜悯与称赞,却在实际审理中牺牲其利益。判词与实断之间的矛盾,实则源于官府在地方治理中对完纳国赋与息讼宁人的综合考量。官府在公开判词与实际裁断之间寻求平衡,以维系各渠坝之间的利益均衡,反映出基层社会治理中的策略选择问题。In the“Wuniu Dam Water Dispute Case”of Hexi Corridor in Qing Dynasty,officials took a compromise approach between the verdict tone and the actual disposition.On the one hand,in the verdict tone,officials rebuked Wu Niu Dam's strong plunder and punished it,but in the actual disposition the offcials frequently compromised to Wuniu Dam.On the other hand,the government gave mercy and praise to Gaotou Dam in the verdict tone,but sacrificed its interests in the actual disposition.Contradiction between verdict tone and actual disposition,actually come from the government's comprehensive consideration of tax-collecting and settling lawsuits in local governance.The government sought a balance between verdict tone and actual disposition to sustain the balance of interests between different sides.This reflected the choice of strategies in grass-roots social governance.

关 键 词：乌牛坝水案 判词 实断 清代 河西走廊 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学] D929[历史地理—中国史]