检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余威震 罗小锋[2] Yu Weizhen;Luo Xiaofeng(College of Economics&Management,China Three Gorges University,Yichang 443002,Hubei,China;College of Economics&Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,Hubei,China)
机构地区:[1]三峡大学经济与管理学院,湖北宜昌443002 [2]华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《中国农业资源与区划》2023年第8期123-133,共11页Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“信息不对称、技术推广与稻农采纳行为:基于生物农药的理论与实证”(72073048);湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究青年项目“‘双碳’目标下农户低碳稻作技术策略、减排效率与政策创新研究”(21Q048)。
摘 要:[目的]厘清农业社会化服务对农户家庭收入的影响机制,对提升农户福利水平和完善农业社会化服务体系具有重要意义。[方法]文章运用内生转换模型、中介效应模型等方法,重点关注于农药减量增效、保障农产品质量安全的农业社会化服务,实证检验其对农户福利的影响。[结果](1)样本农户中农业社会化服务平均采纳项数仅为2.24项,其中统防统治服务和质量检测服务的采用率均不足20%;(2)农业社会化服务能够通过改变农户传统施药观念与提升种植管理水平,改善农户福利,表现为在反事实假设下,实际采用农业社会化服务的农户若不采用,其家庭人均年收入将下降3.78%;(3)农业社会化服务福利效应存在群组差异性,对于高文化程度、低农业劳动比、种植规模较小的农户而言,采用农业社会化服务后福利水平改善程度相对较大。[结论]应持续加强对农业社会化服务的组织形式与服务方式的创新,分类引导不同类型农户理性采用农业社会化服务,充分发挥出农业社会化服务的福利效应。It is of great significance to clarify the impact mechanism of agricultural socialized services on farmers' household income to improve farmers' welfare and the agricultural socialized service.Based on the agricultural socialized service that realized pesticide reduction and efficiency improvement and guaranteed the quality and safety of agricultural products,this paper used the Endogenous Transformation Model and the Mediation Effect Model to empirically test the impact of agricultural socialized services on farmers' welfare.Results were showed as follows.Firstly,the average number of agricultural socialized services adopted by the sample farmers was only 2.24,of which the adoption rates of integrated pest control and quality inspection services were both less than 20%.Secondly,agricultural socialized services could improve farmers' welfare by changing farmers' traditional pesticide application concepts and improving planting management levels.This was manifested in the counterfactual assumption that if farmers who actually used agricultural socialized services did not,their family's per capita annual income would drop 3.78%.Thirdly,there were group differences in the welfare effects of agricultural socialized services.For farmers with higher education,lower agricultural labor ratio,and smaller planting scale,the welfare effect of adopting agricultural socialized services was greater.In summary,we should continue to strengthen the innovation of the organizational form and service mode of agricultural socialization services,and guide different types of farmers to rationally adopt agricultural socialization services,so as to give full play to the welfare effects of agricultural socialization services.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229