轴辐协议之法理困局、违法性分析与规制路径  被引量:1

Hub and Spoke Agreement:Legal Dilemma,Criminal Defenses Analysis and Regulatory Path

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:韩世鹏 HAN Shi-peng(Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 361005,China)

机构地区:[1]厦门大学台湾研究院法律研究所,福建厦门361005

出  处:《时代法学》2023年第5期99-106,共8页Presentday Law Science

摘  要:横向垄断协议适用本身违法原则、纵向垄断协议适用合理原则是我国反垄断执法的标准分析框架,囿于复杂的垄断结构以及模糊的法律性质,经典二分法的既有思路无法对轴辐协议进行妥善处理。基于对垄断结构与实际竞争效果的考量,轴辐协议实际上为横向垄断协议,宜采用本身违法原则。在制度层面,应从现行反垄断法的嵌入、执法模式的选择、责任权属与分配、宽大制度等方面构思因应之策。The application of horizontal monopoly itself is illegal,and the application of reasonable principle of vertical monopoly is the standard analytical framework of anti-monopoly law enforcement in China.Due to the complex monopoly structure and fuzzy legal nature,the existing ideas of the classic Dichotomy cannot properly handle the hub and spoke agreement.Based on the consideration of monopoly structure and actual competitive effects,the axis spoke agreement is actually a horizontal monopoly agreement and should adopt the principle of self illegality.At the institutional level,corresponding strategies should be conceived from the embedding of the current antitrust law,the selection of enforcement models,the ownership and distribution of responsibilities,and a lenient system.

关 键 词:轴辐协议 违法性分析 本身违法 合理分析 责任分配 

分 类 号:D922.291[政治法律—经济法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象