抽水蓄能电站油浸式主变压器灭火系统分析对比研究  

Analysis and Comparison of Fire Extinguishing System for Oil Immersed Main Transformer in Pumped Storage Power Station

作　　者：宋旭峰 刘洋 周淼汛 常龙 王春亭 朱庆龙 胡峰超 毛祥鹏 何中伟 SONG Xu-feng;LIU Yang;ZHOU Miao-xun;CHANG Long;WANG Chun-ting;ZHU Qing-long;HU Feng-chao;MAO Xiang-peng;HE Zhong-wei(State Grid Xinyuan Company Ltd.,Beijing 100052,China;Shanxi Xilongchi Pumped Storage Power Station Co.,Ltd.,Xinzhou 035506,China;Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited,Hangzhou 311122,China)

机构地区：[1]国网新源控股有限公司,北京100052 [2]山西西龙池抽水蓄能电站有限责任公司,山西忻州035506 [3]中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江杭州311122

出　　处：《云南水力发电》2023年第10期353-358,共6页Yunnan Water Power

摘　　要：通过对比水喷雾灭火、细水喷雾灭火、气体灭火、泡沫水喷雾灭火以及排油注氮灭火方式在抽水蓄能电站油浸式主变压器灭火时的使用规范以及异同点,同时对比分析不同灭火方式的优缺点,从消防系统响应时间、储存运输的安全性、事故后清理效率、使用成本以及应对主变复燃情况下的二次处理等多维度进行分析,结合抽水蓄能电站主变布置的实际情况,给出抽水蓄能电站优选的消防灭火系统方案。This paper compares the application specifications and similarities and differences of water spray fire extinguishing,fine water spray fire extinguishing,gas fire extinguishing,foam water spray fire extinguishing and oil discharge and nitrogen injection fire extinguishing methods in oil immersed main transformers of pumped storage power stations.At the same time,it compares and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different fire extinguishing methods,from multiple dimensions such as response time of the fire protection system,safety of storage and transportation,efficiency of post accident cleaning,usage cost,and secondary treatment in case of main transformer reignition.Finally,based on the actual layout of the main transformer in the pumped storage power station,the optimal fire extinguishing system scheme for the pumped storage power station is proposed.

关 键 词：油浸式变压器 水喷雾系统 泡沫水喷雾系统 细水雾灭火系统 气体灭火系统 排油注氮装置 

分 类 号：TM411[电气工程—电器] TU998.132[建筑科学—市政工程]