世界公民交往理念的历史演进及其矛盾性  

The Cosmopolitan's Concept of Communication:Its Historical Evolution and Contradiction

作　　者：单波[1,2] 叶琼 Shan Bo;Ye Qiong

机构地区：[1]武汉大学媒体发展研究中心 [2]武汉大学新闻与传播学院

出　　处：《新闻与传播研究》2023年第8期29-45,126,共18页Journalism & Communication

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大攻关项目“互惠性理解:网络社会跨文化对话理论与方法创新研究”(项目编号:22JJD860007)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：世界公民交往理念在历史层面表现为希腊化悖论、文明化悖论、精英化悖论,演绎出不断超越地方性边界同时又建构某种边界化世界的交往历史,构成跨文化传播领域具有反思意义的问题。从希腊化时代到全球化时代,世界公民的交往世界一直是一个存有边界的世界,难以触及完整而多样的世界。世界公民只能用希腊化的方式、文明化的方式以及精英化的方式去想象世界公民所生存的世界以及交往状态,想象一个完美的自我。其“未思之处”在于:在理解他人之前首先得理解自己;边界与整体是相辅相成的,构成自我的有限性和无限发展的可能性,也构成世界的多样性与统一性;道德自我是不完满的,是在交往实践中发展的;世界公民的交往理念包含一种建构的交往理性,而非在交往关系中生成的演化的交往理性。The cosmopolitan's concept of communication is manifested at the historical level in three paradoxes:a Hellenistic paradox,a civilized paradox,and an elitist paradox.It deduces a history of communication that constantly transcends local boundaries yet at the same time constructs a world with boundaries.This constitutes a question of reflective significance in inter-cultural communication.From the age of Hellenism to the age of globalization,the communication world of the cosmopolitan has always been a world with boundaries,where it is difficult to touch the complete and diverse world.The cosmopolitan can only use Hellenistic,civilized,and elitist ways to imagine the world in which they live,the state of communication,and a perfect self.Its"unthought"lies in several places:Before understanding others,one must understand oneself.The boundary and the whole complement each other,constituting the limitation and the possibility of infinite development of the self,as well as the diversity and unity of the world.The moral self is incomplete which needs to be developed in the practice of communication.The communication concept of the cosmopolitan contains a constructive communication rationality,rather than an evolutionary communication rationality generated in the communication relationship.

关 键 词：世界公民交往理念 希腊化 文明化 精英化 边界 

分 类 号：D034.5[政治法律—政治学] D091[文化科学—传播学] G206