科研诚信规范的法治化及其分析实证主义法哲学路径  

Legalization and Juridification of Research Integrity Regulations and the Path of Analytical Legal Positivism

作　　者：印波 邓莉泓 YIN Bo;DENG Lihong(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088;School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088 [2]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2023年第10期1-11,共11页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家自然科学基金应急管理项目“国家自然科学基金契约化管理模式研究”(项目编号:S2024003);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目“法治视阈下的科研诚信建设”(项目编号:2019SSYB01)。

摘　　要：在一些科研诚信案件调查处理中,“非法定”认定引发了对于科研诚信规范适用的哲学思考。我国科研诚信规范常出现渊源混淆错配、体系脆弱单薄、适用思维断裂等薄弱之处。鉴于法律与应用伦理的可通约性,科研诚信规范完全可以实现法哲学嬗进。基于我国科研事业极强公益属性、学术共同体自律性羸弱、既有宣示性政策缺乏实效性,科研诚信规范应当实现全面法治化。科研诚信规范领域已经出现诸多立法化表征。有必要以分析实证主义法哲学为路径,严格“以规范为准绳”,实现“有规范可依,有规范必依,违反规范必追究,执行规范必严格”,适用位阶原理,运用法教义学与体系解释方法,确保认定的法定性与唯一性,以实现科研诚信治理体系创新。In the process of investigation and resolution of research misconduct cases,‘‘extra-legal’’decisions incur our philosophical thinking about the application of research integrity regulations.There are certain weak points regarding regulations for research integrity in China,such as confusion and mismatch for the sources of law,fragility and thinness for the system,splitting of thought for application.Given the similarity and connectivity between law and applied ethics,regulations for research integrity can completely achieve progression towards the approach of philosophy of law.Considering the strong attribute of safeguarding the public interest in academic research and development in China,fragility of disciplinary systems for academic communities,lack of practicability in pronounced national policies,regulations for research integrity ought to completely move forward to legalization and juridification.Regulations for research integrity have already incorporated various legislative features.In order to innovate research integrity governance system,it is necessary to utilize the approach of legal philosophy,strictly apply the regulations,achieve the object as‘there are regulations to go by that they are observed and strictly enforced,and that violators are brought to book’,and to apply the doctrine of hierarchy of laws,legal dogmatics,and systemic interpretation methods to achieve legality and uniqueness in handling research misconduct cases.

关 键 词：科研诚信规范 分析实证主义 法治化 不端行为 法哲学 

分 类 号：D648.1[政治法律—政治学]