检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘闯 LIU Chuang
机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学学院
出 处:《哲学分析》2023年第5期133-141,199,共10页Philosophical Analysis
摘 要:关于统一对待动/生物知觉与行动的能动推理理论或预测加工理论,其必然性似乎应该从自由能(最小化)原理推导出来,但实际上并不可能。能为这种必然性提供解释的进路,可能在演化博弈论中找到。论证步骤如下:假设某种动/生物在其演化历史中由于某种原因开始采纳能动推理理论中的贝叶斯预测加工模式作为竞争策略来优化指导其知觉与行动,使之相互补助,那么有可能用演化博弈论来建模解释为什么这样的生物在博弈中会胜过采纳了其他策略的动物,或者等价地说,大多数动物个体采纳了这种策略的种群是不会被持其他策略的个体成功入侵的。Regarding the theory of active inference or predictive processing that unified perception andaction,its necessity seems ought to be derivable from the free energy(minimization)principle,but in factit could not be so.However,it seems possible to find an explanation about its necessity in the evolutionary game theory.The outline of our argument goes like this:I suppose a certain organism begining to assume theBayesian predictive processing model in the active inference theory as its strategy for perception and actionand making them mutually complimentary.Then it is possible to use the evolutionary game theory to constructa model to explain how such a kind of organism can win over organisms using other strategies;or equivalently,in a population where the majority of organism uses the strategy in question,then the population would not besuccessfully invaded by organisms using other strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222