佩夫斯纳面向罗斯金:英国艺术批评与历史写作的对话  

Pevsner and Ruskin:A Dialogue Between British Art Criticism and Historical Writing

作　　者：陈书焕 Chen Shuhuan

机构地区：[1]同济大学艺术与传媒学院,上海200092

出　　处：《学术研究》2023年第10期127-134,177,178,共10页Academic Research

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学项目“19世纪英国艺术批评理论和历史意识研究”(20BA016);同济大学部校共建项目“佩夫斯纳与罗斯金研究”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文从思想史的角度出发切入英国19世纪和20世纪艺术批评与历史写作的对话,思考其对艺术理论和史学理论跨学科研究带来的新视角。罗斯金和佩夫斯纳作为英国19世纪和20世纪对英国风景、建筑和设计思想史发展具有广泛影响的理论家,在英国艺术和文化研究领域得到普遍的认同,但对二人在艺术批评和历史意识的关系方面,却鲜有专门研究。本文则致力于推进这方面的研究。“佩夫斯纳面向罗斯金”可以被视为一种合理建构的艺术批评作为历史理解,与历史写作的对话、交流甚至交锋。同时,对我们在当下看待英国19世纪和20世纪的历史过往及其写作,该对话进一步开放了探讨空间。From the perspective of intellectual history,this paper focuses on the development of criticism as a kind of historical understanding,explores the dialogue between British art criticism and historical writing in the 19th and 20th centuries in the way of case comparison,and thinks about its impact on the interdisciplinary research of art theory and historical theory.Ruskin and Pevsner are British theorists who have extensive influence on the development of British landscape,architecture and design theory and history in the 19th and 20th centuries respectively.They are writers,critics,history writers and public intellectuals,and both are widely recognized in the field of British art and cultural studies,but there are few specific studies on the relationship between the two in art criticism and historical consciousness.This paper is dedicated to advancing research in this area.“Pevsner and Ruskin”can be regarded as a reasonably constructed art criticism as a historical understanding,a dialogue,communication,and even confrontation with historical writing.At the same time,the dialogue opens up further space for discussion about how we see Britain’s 19th and 20th century past and its writing in the 21st century.

关 键 词：佩夫斯纳 罗斯金 艺术批评 历史写作 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]