检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈家鸿 CHEN Jia-hong(School of law,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510006,China)
出 处:《河北开放大学学报》2023年第5期42-45,共4页Journal of Hebei Open University
摘 要:自从辩护律师调查取证权构建以来,调查取证难的问题一直在实践中难以解决。在近年刑事司法改革的视野下,充分落实辩护律师调查取证权具有重大意义。推进刑事司法改革视野下辩护律师调查取证权的充分落实,可以从权利本身出发,充分保障自行调查取证权和申请调查取证权,从实践问题出发,赋予值班律师调查取证的权利,从未来路径出发,探索律师调查取证的新途径。Since the construction of defense lawyers’right of investigation and evidence collection,the problem of difficulty in investigation and evidence collection has been difficult to solve in practice.Under the vision of criminal justice reform in recent years,it is of great significance to fully implement the right of defense lawyers to investigate and collect evidence.To promote the full implementation of defense lawyers’right to investigate and collect evidence from the perspective of criminal justice reform,we can fully guarantee the right to investigate and collect evidence by ourselves and the right to apply for investigation and collection of evidence from the perspective of the right itself,give duty lawyers the right to investigate and collect evidence from practical problems,and explore new ways for lawyers to investigate and collect evidence from the future path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91