检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张凯雯 宋怡欣[2] ZHANG Kaiwen;SONG Yixin(School of foreign languages,Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance,Shanghai,201600;School of Business,Shanghai Dianji University,Shanghai 201306,China)
机构地区:[1]上海立信会计金融学院外国语学院,上海201600 [2]上海电机学院商学院,上海201306
出 处:《青岛职业技术学院学报》2023年第4期49-53,共5页Journal of Qingdao Technical College
摘 要:ChatGPT在全球的快速发展引发了人们对人工智能服务治理上的诉求。区别于传统网络服务,人工智能在创立过程中体现出从具象化到抽象化的思维模式、实用主义知行观以及区别于自然人的网络思维架构揭示出其在治理过程中难以回避的人格属性特征。当下制度模式将人工智能服务提供者作为责任核心能够降低制度运行成本,但技术的进步会使人工智能人格属性凸显而提高治理成本。法人制度作为一种选择既能在私法上适应人工智能的发展特点,亦可在公法上满足社会安全,以此为起点需对人工智能服务各方主体的法律关系进行重新界定。The rapid development of ChatGPT in the world has led to the demand for AI services in governance.Unlike traditional web services,the thinking mode,the pragmatism view of knowing and doing and the network thinking structure,which is different from the natural person in the process of artificial intelligence′s service reveal its personality attribute which is difficult to avoid in the process of governance.The current institutional model regards artificial intelligence service providers as the core of responsibility,which can reduce the operating costs of the system.However,technological progress will highlight the personality attributes of artificial intelligence and increase governance costs.As a choice,the system of legal person can not only adapt to the development of artificial intelligence in private law,but also satisfy social security in public law.From this point of view,we need to redefine the legal relationship between the parties of artificial intelligence service.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171