弹性固定与螺钉坚强固定治疗合并下胫腓不稳定踝关节骨折的对照试验  

A controlled trial of elastic fixation and absolute fixation for treatment of ankle fractures with lower tibiofibular instability

作　　者：张国辉 田伟峰 李华 王泉 刘艳辉 关玉龙 肖春来 Zhang Guohui;Tian Weifeng;Li Hua;Wang Quan;Liu Yanhui;Guan Yulong;Xiao Chunlai(Department of Hand and Foot Surgery,Hengshui People’s Hospital,Hengshui 053000,Hebei Province,China)

机构地区：[1]衡水市人民医院手足外科,河北省衡水市053000

出　　处：《中国组织工程研究》2024年第24期3862-3866,共5页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

基　　金：河北省卫生健康委员会基金项目(20210551),项目负责人:张国辉。

摘　　要：背景:尽管传统螺钉内固定治疗踝关节骨折可取得较满意效果,但是刚性内固定方案易于限制踝关节活动,延迟骨折愈合;而弹性内固定更加符合人体力学结构,在踝关节骨折患者中凸显独特优势。目的:对比弹性固定与螺钉坚强固定治疗合并下胫腓不稳定的踝关节骨折的临床效果。方法:回顾性收集2019年8月至2021年8月衡水市人民医院108例伴下胫腓不稳定的老年踝关节骨折患者的临床资料,根据内固定方案分为螺钉组和弹性内固定组(n=54),分别行传统螺钉内固定及弹性内固定治疗。统计并比较两组患者围术期指标、手术效果、经济学效益及美国足踝外科协会评分,对比手术前后血清肿瘤坏死因子α、白细胞介素8水平及踝穴宽度、深度、下胫腓间隙。结果与结论:①弹性内固定组完全负重时间短于螺钉组,操作角度大于螺钉组,并发症发生率低于螺钉组(P<0.05);②术后3 d弹性内固定组血清肿瘤坏死因子α、白细胞介素8水平低于螺钉组(P<0.05);③术后6,12个月两组美国足踝外科协会评分高于术前,下胫腓间隙、踝穴深度及宽度低于术前(P<0.05),但两组间比较无显著差异(P>0.05);④术后12个月两组手术优良率比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);⑤两组直接非医疗成本、直接医疗成本、总成本比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);⑥提示弹性内固定修复合并下胫腓不稳定的老年踝关节骨折效果确切,可缩短完全负重时间、降低并发症、减轻炎症应激。BACKGROUND:Although traditional screw fixation has been successful in treating ankle fractures,rigid fixation solutions tend to restrict ankle movement and delay fracture healing,whereas elastic fixation is more compatible with human mechanics and has unique advantages in patients with ankle fractures.OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effectiveness of elastic fixation and absolute fixation in repairing ankle fractures in the elderly with lower tibiofibular instability.METHODS:The clinical data of 108 elderly ankle fractures with lower tibiofibular instability in Hengshui People’s Hospital from August 2019 to August 2021 were retrospectively collected.They were divided into screw group and elastic fixation group(n=54 per group)according to the surgical protocol,and traditional screw internal fixation and elastic internal fixation were performed respectively.The perioperative indicators,surgical results,economic benefits,and American orthopedic foot and ankle society scores were collected and compared between the two groups.Serum tumor necrosis factor-α,interleukin-8 levels,ankle cavity width,depth,and lower tibiofibular space were compared before and after surgery.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The full weight-bearing time was shorter in the elastic fixation group than that in the screw group;the operating angle was greater in the elastic fixation group than that in the screw group,and the complication rate was lower in the elastic fixation group than that in the screw group(P<0.05).(2)Serum tumor necrosis factor-αand interleukin-8 levels in the elastic fixation group were lower than those in the screw group 3 days after surgery(P<0.05).(3)American orthopedic foot and ankle society scores in the two groups were higher than those before surgery at 6 and 12 months after surgery,and the depth and width of the inferior tibiofibular space and ankle cavity were lower than those before surgery(P<0.05);but no significant difference was detected between the two groups(P>0.05).(4)There was no significant difference in the ex

关 键 词：老年 踝关节 下胫腓不稳定 弹性内固定 螺钉 经济学 

分 类 号：R459.9[医药卫生—治疗学] R318[医药卫生—临床医学] R687