检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林华[1] Lin Hua
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学习近平法治思想研究院,北京100088
出 处:《湖湘法学评论》2023年第4期20-28,共9页HUXIANG LAW REVIEW
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目:互联网行政许可设定的法律问题研究(18BFX050)。
摘 要:我国社会团体服务性收费的制度框架呈现层次性、多阶性和碎片化的特征,其内容包括调整社会团体性质的制度规范、调整服务性收费的制度规范、调整社会团体收费的制度规范、调整个别性社会团体收费的制度规范。社会团体服务性收费的规范体系存在着收费权力法定与规范位阶低之间的困境、直接规范依据缺乏与制度碎片化之间的困境、社会团体种类繁多与制度范围模糊性之间的困境、制度规范衔接与规范内容不一致的困境等问题。推进社会团体服务性收费的制度构造有两条体系化的进路,一是进行统一立法,二是对现有制度进行规范清理。The institutional framework of service charges of social groups in China is characterized by layers,levels and fragmentation,including the institutional norms for adjusting the nature of social groups,those for adjusting service charges,those for adjusting social group charges,and those for adjusting individual social group charges.Some problems exist in the norm system of service charges of social groups,such as the dilemma between the legal power of charges and the low rank of the norm,that between the lack of direct basis of the norm and the fragmentation of the institution,that between the various types of social groups and the ambiguity of the scope of the institution,and that between the convergence of the system and the inconsistence in the content of different norms.There are two systematic approaches to promoting the system structure of social groups’service charge,one is to carry out the unified legislation,the other is to standardize and clear up the existing institutions.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.52.13