逻辑反例外论的多重面孔及其困境  

The Multiple Faces of Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic and Its Dilemma

作　　者：颜中军 曹时艳 YAN Zhongjun;CAO Shiyan(School of Marxism Studies,Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411201,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南科技大学马克思主义学院,湖南湘潭411201

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期31-38,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD046)。

摘　　要：基于对先验性、分析性等概念的不同阐释,逻辑反例外论至少可以区分为三种不同立场:认识论的反例外论、形上学的反例外论和方法论的反例外论,从而显示出阵营内部的分歧。溯因方法论也面临着乞题谬误和恶性倒退之类的麻烦,最终导致极端相对主义,违反题材中立原则,甚至与逻辑反例外论的初衷相悖。逻辑例外论与反例外论各自强调逻辑相对于其他科学的特殊性与连续性,分别针对逻辑与逻辑理论,二者并无实质性冲突,完全可以和谐共处。Based on the different interpretations of apriority,analyticity and other notions,anti-exceptionalism about logic(AEL)can distinguish at least three different positions:epistemological-exceptionalism,metaphysical-exceptionalism and methodological-exceptionalism,which shows the divergences within the AEL.The abductive methodology of logical theory choice is confranted with problems such as the fallacy of begging question and infinite regression,and eventually leads to extreme relativism,which violates the principle of subject neutrality,and even contradicts the original purpose of AEL.AEL and Exceptionalism about Logic(EL)emphasizes the particularity and continuity between logic and other sciences respectively,aimed at logic and logical theory respectively.There is no substantive conflict between them,so they can coexist harmoniously.

关 键 词：逻辑反例外论 连续主义 非先验主义 修正主义 溯因方法论 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]