基于熵权-TOPSIS的光电光热制冷系统评价与分析  

EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC AND PHOTOTHERMAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEM BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT-TOPSIS

作　　者：王天东 何子睿 单晓芳 刘广东 邓勤犁[1,2] 任志刚[1,2] Wang Tiandong;He Zirui;Shan Xiaofang;Liu Guangdong;Deng Qinli;Ren Zhigang(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430070,China;Hainan Institute,Wuhan University of Technology,Sanya 572024,China;Luneng Group Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100020,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学土木工程与建筑学院,武汉430070 [2]武汉理工大学海南研究院,三亚572024 [3]鲁能集团有限公司,北京100020

出　　处：《太阳能学报》2023年第9期229-235,共7页Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica

基　　金：国家“十三五”重点研发计划(2018YFD1100702-3);海南省重大科技计划(ZDJK2021024);武汉理工大学三亚科教园开放基金(2021KF0004)。

摘　　要：以三亚市某办公建筑为例,基于TRNSYS建立传统制冷系统、太阳能光电制冷系统和太阳能光热制冷系统,并对系统进行能耗模拟。然后以能源、经济和环境效益作为评价指标,使用熵权-TOPSIS法对传统制冷系统、光电制冷系统的两种不同方案、光热制冷系统进行综合评价,并对各方案进行比较。结果表明:太阳能光电制冷系统的两种不同方案的综合效益显著优于传统制冷系统;按耗电量匹配的光电制冷系统方案优于按最大安装面积匹配的系统方案;并且太阳能光电制冷系统比太阳能光热制冷系统具有更好的综合效益。Taking an office building in Sanya as an example,the traditional refrigeration system,solar photovoltaic refrigeration system and solar photothermal refrigeration system are established based on TRNSYS,and the energy consumption of the system is simulated.Then,with energy,economic and environmental benefits as the evaluation indicators,the entropy weight-TOPSIS method is used to comprehensively evaluate the traditional refrigeration system,two different schemes of the photoelectric refrigeration system,and the photothermal refrigeration system,and compare the schemes.The results show that the comprehensive benefits of the two different schemes of the solar photovoltaic refrigeration system are significantly better than the traditional refrigeration system,the photovoltaic refrigeration system scheme matched by power consumption is better than the system scheme matched by the maximum installation area,and the solar photovoltaic refrigeration system has better comprehensive benefits than the solar photothermal refrigeration system.

关 键 词：太阳能 制冷 光伏 光热 熵权-TOPSIS 综合评价 

分 类 号：TK519[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]