检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵子婕 朱立 朱晋峰[1] 余雄飞 SHAO Zijie;ZHU Li;ZHU Jinfeng;YU Xiongfei(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 20042,China;Shanghai Customs College,Shanghai 201204,China;Shenzhou Judicial Authentication Center,Nanchang 330046,Jiangxi,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042 [2]上海海关学院,上海201204 [3]江西神州司法鉴定中心,江西南昌330046
出 处:《世界农药》2023年第10期5-11,共7页World Pesticide
摘 要:涉农药司法鉴定工作、鉴定人和专家辅助人有助于专业性较强的涉农药案件纠纷化解。我国现阶段涉农药案件中专家辅助人制度存在缺陷和漏洞,如专家辅助人的意见处理错误、选任标准不明、参诉程序不清等,基于涉农药案件的特点,结合域外关于专家证人、诉讼辅佐人和技术顾问的经验,提出专家辅助人制度在我国涉农药案件中的健全完善相关建议。Pesticide forensic work,appraisers and expert assistants are conducive to resolving disputes in highly professional pesticide cases.This paper aims at the defects and loopholes of expert assistant system in pesticide cases in our country at the present stage,such as the opinions of expert assistants are handled incorrectly,the selection criteria are unclear,and the procedures for participating in the lawsuit are unclear,basing on the characteristics of pesticide cases,and combining the experience of expert witnesses,litigation assistants and technical advisers in the extra-territorial expert system,putting forward some suggestions on the improvement of the expert assistant system in the cases involving pesticides in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38