检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈伟 CHEN Wei(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出 处:《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第5期99-107,共9页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字经济下我国劳动法面临的挑战与转型研究”(19CFX077)。
摘 要:随着老龄化社会的深刻影响日益凸显,家庭照顾的负担和风险日益增加。传统家庭照顾模式之下,照顾责任完全由家庭承担,需要照顾的儿童、老人等家庭成员权益无法得到保障,承担照顾责任的父母等家庭成员无法实现工作与家庭的平衡。基于对国际法和宪法的分析,家庭享有社会保护的权利是不可剥夺的,政府对家庭照顾责任的分担应当视为政府的一项基本责任,视作政府对人性尊严的承诺。人性尊严理应成为政府承担家庭照顾责任的重要衡量标准。政府可以综合运用积极权利路径、消极权利路径、权利表达路径等方式,实现照顾责任的政府与家庭共担。As the profound impact of aging society becomes increasingly prominent,the burden and risk of family care are increasing.Under the traditional family care model,the rights and interests of family members such as children and the elderly in need of care cannot be protected,and family members such as parents with the responsibility cannot achieve a balance between work and family.Based on the analysis of international law and the Constitution,the family's right to social protection is inalienable.The government's sharing of family care responsibilities should be regarded as a government's basic responsibility and as a government's commitment to human dignity.Human dignity should become an important criterion for the government to take care of the family.The government can comprehensively use the positive rights approach,the negative rights approach,and the expressive approach to realize the shared responsibility of the government and the family.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.4.144