检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金晓康 Jin Xiaokang(Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387)
出 处:《心理学探新》2023年第2期155-161,共7页Psychological Exploration
摘 要:比起新的信息,重复接触过的信息会被认为更真实,这一效应称为虚假真实效应(Illusory-truth effect)。本文对这一效应的几种理论解释进行了比较,认为加工流畅性——认知加工过程中体验到的轻松体验——是最基础、最简洁的解释,并从加工流畅性产生的条件、原因、与情感的联系、神经基础方面进一步分析了加工流畅性的影响机制。此外,虚假真实效应非常稳健,虽然一些方法能有效降低虚假真实效应,但仍没有办法完全消除。未来应该更多地从干预的角度出发探究如何有效地避免此效应对人们的影响。Compared to new information,information that has been repeatedly exposed to it will be considered more true.This effect is called the Illusory-truth effect.This article compares several theoretical explanations of this effect,and believes that processing fluency—the relaxing experience experienced in the process of cognitive processing—is the most basic and concise explanation.In addition,we further clarify the cognitive mechanism of processing fluency in terms of when fluency occurs,why fluency equals reality,the connection between fluency and emotion,and the neural mechanism of processing fluency.In addition,the false-true effect is very robust.Although some methods can effectively reduce the repetitive effect,there is still no way to completely eliminate it.In the future,we should explore how to effectively avoid the impact of this effect on people from the perspective of intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15