跨国网络犯罪中刑事管辖权的适用困境及解决  

The Dilemma and Resolution of Criminal Jurisdiction in Transnational Cybercrime

作　　者：张婷[1] 陈立[1] ZHANG Ting;CHEN Li

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《中南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第10期108-115,185,共9页Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“智慧司法背景下案件事实的分层论证”(21AFX002);中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研项目“习近平法治思想中的公正司法理论研究”(2722022EX002)。

摘　　要：跨国网络犯罪的刑事管辖权是刑法适用的一个难题,传统的属地管辖、属人管辖、保护管辖和普遍管辖原则在这类案件中存在着适用上的困境,因此发展出了网络自治理论、网址管辖理论、有限管辖理论及实害原则予以完善。但这些新的网络犯罪管辖权理论具有各自的缺点,无法妥当有效地解决跨国网络犯罪中的管辖权适用难题。就本质而言,跨国网络犯罪管辖权适用困境的核心在于不同国家间的管辖权冲突。故在尊重各国网络主权的前提下,通过完善国际立法、加强国际刑事司法合作、构建共同的国际磋商机制等方式,消除国家管辖权间的冲突,是解决跨国网络犯罪刑事管辖权适用难题的应有路径。The criminal jurisdiction of transnational cybercrime poses a challenge to the application of criminal law,and the traditional principles of territorial jurisdiction,personal jurisdiction,protective jurisdiction and universal jurisdiction face difficulties in their application in such cases.Therefore,the theories of network autonomy,website jurisdiction,limited jurisdiction,and the principle of harm have been developed to improve them.However,these new theories of jurisdiction over cybercrime have their own shortcomings and cannot properly and effectively solve the problem of jurisdiction application in transnational cybercrime.Essentially,the core of the dilemma in the application of jurisdiction in transnational cybercrime lies in jurisdictional conflicts between different countries.Therefore,under the premise of respecting the network sovereignty of various countries,eliminating conflicts between national jurisdictions through improving international legislation,strengthening international criminal justice cooperation,and building a common international consultation mechanism is the necessary path to solve the problem of applying criminal jurisdiction to transnational cybercrime.

关 键 词：跨国网络犯罪 管辖权冲突 实害联系原则 国际刑事司法合作 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]