BiPAP无创呼吸机不同供氧方式应用效果观察  

Observation on the application effect of different oxygen supply modes of BiPAP noninvasive ventilator

作　　者：袁广琴 林云霞[1] 洪梅[1] Yuan Guangqin;Lin Yunxia;Hong Mei(Nanjing Chest Hospital ZIP Code,210000)

机构地区：[1]南京市胸科医院,210000

出　　处：《现代科学仪器》2023年第5期78-81,共4页Modern Scientific Instruments

基　　金：南京市卫生和计划生育委员会课题,项目编号:YKK18163。

摘　　要：目的:探究双水平气道正压(BiPAP)无创呼吸机不同供氧方式的应用效果。方法:选取104例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并II型呼吸衰竭患者,随机分为观察组、对照组各52例,分别采取鼻导管、面罩方式进行供氧。比较治疗总有效率、血气指标、肺功能指标、COPD生活质量调查问卷(SGRQ)评分以及并发症发生率。结果:观察组治疗后有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);两组治疗后的血气指标、肺功能指标及SGRQ评分相比治疗前均改善,观察组优于对照组(P<0.05);并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:BiPAP无创呼吸机鼻导管供氧方式的临床应用效果较优。Objective:To explore the effects of different oxygen supply modes of BiPAP non-invasive ventilator.Methods:A total of 104 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)combined with respiratory failure type II were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 52 patients in each group.Nasal catheter and mask were used for oxygen supply,respectively.Total response rate,blood gas index,pulmonary function index,COPD quality of life questionnaire(SGRQ)score,and complication rate were compared.Results:The effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Blood gas indexes,lung function indexes and SGRQ scores of both groups were improved after treatment,and the observation group was better than the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in complication rate(P>0.05).Conclusion:The nasal catheter oxygen supply of BiPAP non-invasive ventilator has better clinical effect.

关 键 词：慢性阻塞性肺病 II型呼吸衰竭 BIPAP无创呼吸机 供氧方式 血气指标 预后 

分 类 号：R563[医药卫生—呼吸系统]