检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:辛俊生 王富强[1] 郝军刚 XIN Junsheng;WANG Fuqiang;HAO Jungang(China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute,Beijing 100120,China)
出 处:《水力发电》2023年第11期67-72,78,共7页Water Power
摘 要:抽水蓄能电站建设进入了快速发展阶段。部分抽水蓄能电站工程采用了全库盆防渗,全库盆防渗方案主要有沥青混凝土面板全库盆防渗、库岸钢筋混凝土+库底土工膜防渗和全库盆钢筋混凝土防渗等。介绍了全库盆防渗结构中常用的3种不同防渗形式(沥青混凝土面板、钢筋混凝土面板、土工膜)的特点,对比分析3种防渗形式的主要优缺点,并探讨全库盆防渗形式选择应考虑的因素,研究对比了在相同库容条件下全库盆防渗工程防渗总面积的影响因素。The construction of pumped-storage power stations has entered a rapid development stage.Some pumped-storage power stations use the whole reservoir basin seepage control schemes,which mainly includes three different schemes of whole reservoir basin asphalt concrete face slab,reservoir bank reinforced concrete+reservoir bottom geomembrane,and whole basin reinforced concrete.Three different structure types for whole reservoir basin seepage control are introduced,including asphalt concrete face slab,reinforced concrete face slab and geomembrane,and the main advantages and disadvantages of these three seepage control types are compared and analyzed.The factors to be considered in the selection of whole reservoir basin seepage control types are discussed,and the influencing factors of total anti-seepage area of whole reservoir basin seepage project under same reservoir capacity are also compared.
关 键 词:抽水蓄能电站 全库盆防渗 防渗形式 沥青混凝土面板 钢筋混凝土面板 土工膜
分 类 号:TV7431[水利工程—水利水电工程] TV223.4
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.223.53