检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾雨璇 JIA Yu-xuan(School of International Economics and Trade,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu,Anhui 233000,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学国际经济贸易学院,安徽蚌埠233000
出 处:《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》2023年第4期38-43,共6页Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
基 金:安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(ACYC2021234)。
摘 要:基于2011—2020年的省际面板数据,将农地“三权分置”制度改革作为虚拟变量,在考虑其内生性基础上进行基准回归,并分析农地产权制度改革对城乡收入差距的影响效应。研究结果表明:农地“三权分置”政策能够有效促进城乡收入差距的缩小,但其边际效应存在政府干预程度的异质性;农地“三权分置”制度改革可通过农地流转间接促进城乡收入差距的缩小。据此提出应持续深化农地“三权分置”改革、完善相关制度与规定和规范农地流转市场等建议。Based on the inter-provincial panel data from 2011 to 2020,using the reform of the“Three Rights Separation”system for the farmland as a dummy variable,a benchmark regression is conducted to analyze the influence of the reform of the farmland property right system on the urban-rural income gap based on its endogeneity.The results show that the policy of“Three Rights Separation”on the farmland can effectively narrow the urban-rural income gap through farmland transfer,but its marginal effects show the heterogeneity of government intervention.Based on the findings of the study,it is suggested that the reform of the“Three Rights Separation”of the farmland should be deepened continuously,the relevant systems and regulations should be improved to ensure the effective implementation of the policy,and the farmland transfer market should be regulated to ensure the land rights and interests of both parties of the contracted management rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.193.52