检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文红 Li Wenhong
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学德语学院
出 处:《台湾研究》2023年第5期40-50,共11页Taiwan Studies
摘 要:2022年是中德建交50周年,在这50年间,两国关系总体发展稳健向好,交流与合作领域日趋广泛。但是,2021年底“红绿灯”政府上台后,其在美国施压与执政联盟内部因素的共同作用下,在涉华问题上屡屡对中国发难,甚至在执政纲领中提到“台湾地区问题”,中德关系面临严峻挑战。这一新动向及其背后的含义需要引起我们高度的关注。从德国对台政策的历史脉络和有关数据资料看,德国的“对台政策”没有突破“一个中国”的原则,但不乏打政治“擦边球”的不和谐声音,甚至模糊“一个中国”原则内涵的企图。我们要警惕德国打“台湾牌”,坚守住底线,不让“台独”分子有可乘之机。The year 2022 marks the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Germany.During these 50 years,the overall development of relations between the two countries has been steady and positive,and the areas of exchange and cooperation have become increasingly extensive.However,after the“red-green light”government came to power at the end of 2021,it has repeatedly raised questions about China under the combined effect of U.S.pressure and internal factors of the ruling coalition,and even mentioned the“Taiwan Question”in its governing platform,posing serious challenges to Sino-German relations.China-Germany relations are facing serious challenges.This new trend and its implications require our great attention.The history of Germany's policy toward Taiwan and the relevant data show that Germany's“policy toward Taiwan”has not broken through the one-China Principle,but there is no shortage of discordant voices playing political“sidesteps”and even blurring the connotation of the one-China principle.We should be wary of Germany playing the“Taiwan card”and hold fast to the bottom line to deny the“Taiwan independence”elements an opportunity to take advantage of it.
分 类 号:D618[政治法律—政治学] D827.58[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229