经典决策论的规范性问题及其回应  

The Problem of A Normative Interpretation of Classical Decision Theory and Responses

作　　者：宋子明 Ziming Song

机构地区：[1]四川大学哲学系

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2023年第5期35-46,共12页Studies in Logic

摘　　要：决策论哲学中的一个重要问题是如何在规范层面上理解经典决策论。即使作为形式工具,自创始之初它就被认为符合人类理性选择的某些基本原则,被用来说明和预测选择行动。这一决策论的心智主义解释预设理论元素具有心理实存对应物。当代对心智主义预设的质疑认为,它误解了决策论的形式理论。同时,决策论的规范维度也受到行为经济学等实证研究的挑战。然而,通过进一步分析决策论的规范性刻画问题,本文辩护一种从规范层面刻画经典决策论的立场,旨在表明规范性决策论是评估选择合意性的一种“逻辑”。One important problem in the philosophy of decision theory is how to understand classical decision theory at the normative level.Even as a formal tool,it has been regarded as conforming to certain basic principles of human rational choice since its inception,and has been used to explain and predict choice behavior.The mentalist interpretation of decision theory presupposes that the theoretical elements have corresponding psychological counterparts.Contemporary criticisms of the mentalist presupposition argue that it misconstrues the formal model of decision theory.Meanwhile,the normative dimension of decision theory is also challenged by empirical research such as behavioral economics.However,with further analysis of the problem of normatively characterizing decision theory,I defend a position that characterizes classical decision theory from a normative perspective,aiming to demonstrate that normative decision theory is a“logic”for evaluating the desirability of choices.

关 键 词：合理性原则 经典决策理论 心智主义 规范性 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]