傅玄《魏书》底本与“三史故事”考论  

A Study on FuXuan's Original Text of the History of Wei and‘the Cases of Three Histories'

作　　者：伏煦 Fu Xu

机构地区：[1]山东大学文艺美学研究中心

出　　处：《国学学刊》2023年第3期82-95,141,共15页Research in the Traditions of Chinese Culture

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“子集兴替:中古学术著述方式的转型”(21FZWB074)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：清代学者严可均根据《晋书·傅玄传》对《傅子》的相关记载,以及《三国志》裴注所引录的《傅子》,推断《傅子》中篇为《魏书》底本、外篇为“三史故事”。裴注引录的《傅子》原文,大部分属于《魏书》底本所立传记,个别人物评论等内容,则可能属于内篇;而现存“三史故事”的佚文,则是舆服、丧礼制度和法律判例,具有与正史史志比较的价值。总体而言,由于《傅子》的散佚,后人对其书兼备史体的著述性质认识不足;《魏书》底本与“三史故事”皆是傅玄个人著述的一部分,傅玄将其编入作为子书的《傅子》,在学术史上亦是极为罕见的。According to the record on Fuzi in FuXuan's biography of the history of Jin,and the context cited in Pei's annotate on a Record of Three Kingdom,YanKejun the scholar of Qing Dynasty speculates that the second part of Fuzi is the base text of the History of Wei,as well as the third part is the cases of three histories'.Most of the original text cited in Pei's annotate is the chronicle and biography of base text of the History of Wei,little comments on historical figures may belong to the first part.The existing text of'the cases of three histories',which is about the system of Yu-fu system,funeral ritual system and legal precedents,is worth comparing with the annals of official history.In general,due to the loss of Fuzi,later readers have insufficient understanding of its nature as a historical work.Both base text of the History of Wei and‘the cases of three histories'are the parts of FuXuan's individual writings,and FuXuan compiled them into his philosophical work,which is also extremely rare in the academic history.

关 键 词：《傅子》 《三国志》裴注 史志 

分 类 号：K23[历史地理—历史学] K092[历史地理—中国史]